Click on images above to enlarge.
The images are self explanatory, although technically, I don't quite fully understand the process. I have always been amazed to read, on various sites, that CMOS APS-C sized sensors were limited to 10MP. A decade ago, CCD sensors were apparently limited to 3 or 4MP while CMOS sensors were too expensive and had a lower IQ. We have surpassed these barriers many times over and I have no doubts that new technological advancements will make it possible in a not-so-distant future, to pack 20MP on an APS-C sensor with excellent IQ at all ISO.
The buzz word these days is Full Frame. The full frame sensors are a vestige from the 35mm cameras era. It was just a handy way to make 35mm lenses fit on a new digital SLR design. Yes, the 35mm lenses do fit on the APS-C sized camera but project an image circle bigger than what the sensor can capture, hence the cropped image circle that makes a 200mm lens act like a 300mm lens and a 20mm wide angle lens act like a 30mm lens. I think it's wonderful. Have you priced a 300mm f/2.8 versus a 200mm f/2.8 lately? Telephotos are much more expensive than wide angle lenses. APS-C ultra wide angle lenses are now available, at about the same reasonable price of full frame wide angle lenses, making the APS-C sized cameras getting the best of both worlds. See previously post "APS-C versus Full Frame".
Pentax may produce a full frame sensor in the future, but it will only to meet the false perception of the consumers that bigger is always better. With time, the APS-C sized sensors will have the same IQ and pixel count of the full frame sensors. Full Frame DSLR cameras and lenses will always cost more to manufacture and will forever be heavier. As example, the Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II series and the Nikon D3 are great cameras but costs between $5,000 and $7,000 US. If you have ever held one of these cameras, you know just how heavy and bulky they are.
So, from my point-of-view, I believe in technology, the same technology that brought us from silver halide film to this new digital age and to this 14.6MP CMOS sensor that the Pentax K20D and the Samsung GX-20 have introduced. It offers the greatest resolution in its class.
Thank you for reading. Tomorrow, I will post more about my PMA 2008 experience with the new Pentax cameras and lenses.
Thank you for reading.
Yvon Bourque
4 comments:
I hope youre right. Time will tell.
Hi Yvon ... just sent a message via Photo.net.
Questions if only you have time:
I have the following equipment and I am considering selling some of it so that I can have GOOD glass, readying myself for a future purchase of the K20D.
Equipment:
K10D
Pentax DA 18-250
Pentax FA 50 f/1.4
Sigma 10-20mm (new)
Sigma 28-200 (Oldie!)a/f
Basically, apart from other stuff such as filters, etc ... that is all.
I am considering keeping the 10-20 and the 50mm lenses, but I would sure know whether it would be worthy to acquire the 16-50 DA* (or maybe another lens with similar characteristics) and later get what I think is a Pentax DA* tele-zoom which was recently announced (50 or 60 to 200 or 250, I am not sure).
All in all, what would be a good quality "set" of lenses with the present K10D, in view of the K20D?
Hope this is not too much to ask, but if time is precious (like me you have a day job!), I'll understand.
Thnaks a bunch ... and I find your blog fantastic!
JP
jp,
All Pentax lenses are good. The Sigma 10-20mm is good although I prefer Pentax DA 12-24mm. I don't like zoom lenses all that much as they don't compare to prime lenses for IQ. They also tend to be slower lenses (Smaller maximum Aperture). I would keep the Sigma 10-20 since you have it, and the FA 50mm f/1.4
The DA 18-250mm has a ratio so high that it can't be good at all focal lengths and is somewhat a slow lens. The DA 21mm and 70mm limited are great lenses. The new DA* 200 f/2.8 and the DA* 300 f/4 are great lenses.
It comes down to what type of photography you like. Sport photography will call for a fast extreme telephoto. Portrait will call for a large maximum aperture from a 70 to 100mm lens, and landscape will benefit from wide angle lens with great depth of field, and so on.
I hope this helps. This is only one man's opinion.
Regards,
Yvon Bourque
Is that proven technology or wishfull thinking?
Post a Comment