Hi Photographer friends,
No explanation needed.
P.S. Visit us on Facebook and please like us.
https://www.facebook.com/pentaxdslrs
OS
|
Microsoft
Windows 7 (32 or 64 bit)
|
With
a 64-bit system, the software operates as a 32-bit application.
|
|
CPU
|
Intel
Core 2 Duo processor or later (Intel Core i5 processor or later recommended)
|
Memory
|
2GB
or greater (3GB or greater recommended)
|
HDD
|
More
than 1GB of available disk space (additional space required for image
storage)
|
Others
|
USB
2.0 port
|
.NET
Framework 4 software
|
OS
|
Mac
OS X 10.6 / 10.7
|
CPU
|
Intel
Core 2 Duo processor or later (Intel Core i5 processor or later recommended)
|
Not
compatible with PowerPC processors
|
|
Memory
|
2GB
or greater
|
HDD
|
More
than 1GB of available disk space (additional space required for image
storage)
|
Others
|
USB
2.0 port
|
Hi Pentaxian friends.
1. Lately, I saw many posts about Hoya wanting to associate with another world-class company that could manufacture sensors for them. This could make Pentax viable outside the Hoya’s mission of medical instruments and the like. Hoya apparently purchased Pentax mostly for their medical instruments. It seems that Samsung eventually want to manufacture their own cameras with their own sensors…as I was told, at the last PMA, by a Samsung representative. What do you think?
2. The K-x is now available almost everywhere. It is equipped, as you know, with a Sony 12MP CMOS sensor. The low light/high ISO image quality is supposedly on the leading edge of all the current DSLRs. What would you think of a Pentax K-7x with the 12MP sensor instead of the Samsung 14MP? If the IQ were that much better, I would go for it. After all, Nikon seems to manufacture many models around the 12MP range and they are doing okay. In the past, I produce great enlargements of 11” x 14” and even 18” x 24” with the old Pentax 6MP DSLRs. If the IQ is better, 12MP is plenty and I believe it is the sweet spot for APS-C sensors. What do you think?
3. I own several Pentax lenses, some are “A” lenses, some are FA lenses, some DA Pancake prime lenses and some DA* zoom lenses, telephotos and primes. I am not a pixel peeper and frankly, I don’t see enough difference in image quality between any of my lenses to prefer one over another. For me, it boils down to what I am shooting on a particular day or what I can easily carry. I do use Photoshop to correct colors, Chromatic aberration and so on, but never to change the content of an image. It’s the darkroom of this era, why not use it to its full potential. If your picture is well composed, I don’t think that the viewers would see any difference between the IQ of one lens over another. What do you think?
4. I envision that Pentax will indeed introduce the 645D next year. They will jump from the APS-C sensor to one bigger than the Canon or Nikon FF sensors. Pentax made it clear before that they would never manufacture a FF DSLR. Would you get a 645D should the price be comparable to Nikon’s D3/D3X/D3S or Canon’s EOS 1Ds Mk III? There are thousands or millions of 645 used lenses on the market already and Pentax could introduce new 645 AF lenses modeled after the Film 645 medium format cameras. I would buy one. What do you think?
So there you have it, some random thought about Pentax’s future. I’m a die-hard fan of Pentax cameras and know that they will always emerge with something unexpected, innovative and great.
Thanks for reading, and what do you think?
Yvon Bourque
Visitors to this page also liked: See "Recommended Reading" on the right column. We honor reciprocal links. Email: brqyvn@aol.com
Hi Pentaxian friends.
I just thought that this article published in July was appropriate now that Pentax has the K-7 and the K-x available.